<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revolutionreality.com/2006/09/10/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revolutionreality.com/2006/09/10/politics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:56:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.revolutionreality.com/2006/09/10/politics/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revolutionreality.com/2006/09/10/politics/#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>In all things, there will always be someone looking for money.  Dems like to take it, Republicans like the people to keep it.  The only liberals who &lt;i&gt;are not&lt;/i&gt; &quot;working to destroy the fabric of Amerian life&quot; is more moderates than they are liberals, now.  I&#039;ve not heard of &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; of them running (as the Democratic party want&#039;s committed liberals now).  The Democratic party of the past is no more.  If you, and others, do not find this out -- we&#039;ll all find out the hard way.  9/11 was nothing compared to what&#039;ll happen if they get elected.

Christians should vote Republican solely for the reason of the unborns voice being heard.  With that also comes pro-traditional marriage, and other items.

As far as liberal/conservative friends, I&#039;ve got both too.  We get along fine (unless we do talk about politics).  And no, I don&#039;t see them as &quot;less Christian&quot; or anything.  I do, though, see that the descriptions I named for liberals apply to them (as do most other liberals I&#039;ve met).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all things, there will always be someone looking for money.  Dems like to take it, Republicans like the people to keep it.  The only liberals who <i>are not</i> &#8220;working to destroy the fabric of Amerian life&#8221; is more moderates than they are liberals, now.  I&#8217;ve not heard of <i>any</i> of them running (as the Democratic party want&#8217;s committed liberals now).  The Democratic party of the past is no more.  If you, and others, do not find this out &#8212; we&#8217;ll all find out the hard way.  9/11 was nothing compared to what&#8217;ll happen if they get elected.</p>
<p>Christians should vote Republican solely for the reason of the unborns voice being heard.  With that also comes pro-traditional marriage, and other items.</p>
<p>As far as liberal/conservative friends, I&#8217;ve got both too.  We get along fine (unless we do talk about politics).  And no, I don&#8217;t see them as &#8220;less Christian&#8221; or anything.  I do, though, see that the descriptions I named for liberals apply to them (as do most other liberals I&#8217;ve met).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audiomodder</title>
		<link>http://www.revolutionreality.com/2006/09/10/politics/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>audiomodder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revolutionreality.com/2006/09/10/politics/#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>what upsets me about this post is not that you point out several problems with the democrats, what upsets me is that you seem to have it in your head that republicans are the answer.  let me assure you that most republicans are not working for the common good of the country.  like the democrats, they are more concerned with lining their own pockets.

the issue here is not conservative/liberal, but to generalize that all liberals are the same and all working to destroy the fabric of American life is exactly the close-mindedness that makes us Christians look more like robot nut-jobs than just about anything else.  rush limbaugh may have a good name within the right 1/3 of society, but to the rest of the world, he&#039;s an entertainer with a political bend.

i tend to be a little more liberal than the average person.  my roommate (and bandmate) is more conservative.  we get along because we put our passion for following Jesus before politics and neither of us assume that one way is &quot;more Christian&quot; than the other.  simply put, my love for Jesus won&#039;t keep me from voting for a conservative candidate, but it certainly won&#039;t make me vote for one either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what upsets me about this post is not that you point out several problems with the democrats, what upsets me is that you seem to have it in your head that republicans are the answer.  let me assure you that most republicans are not working for the common good of the country.  like the democrats, they are more concerned with lining their own pockets.</p>
<p>the issue here is not conservative/liberal, but to generalize that all liberals are the same and all working to destroy the fabric of American life is exactly the close-mindedness that makes us Christians look more like robot nut-jobs than just about anything else.  rush limbaugh may have a good name within the right 1/3 of society, but to the rest of the world, he&#8217;s an entertainer with a political bend.</p>
<p>i tend to be a little more liberal than the average person.  my roommate (and bandmate) is more conservative.  we get along because we put our passion for following Jesus before politics and neither of us assume that one way is &#8220;more Christian&#8221; than the other.  simply put, my love for Jesus won&#8217;t keep me from voting for a conservative candidate, but it certainly won&#8217;t make me vote for one either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.154 seconds -->

